No text references to figure elements by color should be used: for example, replace “the red line in Figure 2” with “the dashed line in Figure 2”.Īs discussed above, JME asks that the author prepare a detailed response to the prior round comments of the referee and editor, which you include with your submission after any appendices, figures, etc. To this end, no colored backgrounds are permitted. (4) All figures should be understandable when printed in black and white. (3) Each figure and table should appear at the back of the submitted manuscript, each on a separate page, after references and before appendices. (2) All figures and tables should include an explanatory footnote to aid the reader’s interpretation.
ACCEPT WITH MINOR REVISIONS SERIES
Axes should be clearly marked legends should be employed to identify individual series in a plot with multiple series
(1) Figures and tables should be designed so that the reader can understand the table/figure without reference back to the main text for the definitions of variables, etc. Please report any difficulties with implementing this style to improvement of figures and tables is frequently an important part of a revision at this stage. If you are working in the Scientific Word version of TeX, then an easy way to do this is to use the DRAFT mode in the JME manuscript shell.
JME requires that all resubmissions be prepared in 12 point type with double spacing and line numbering: this makes it easy for the reviewer and editor to give you detailed feedback on your work. That is, the accept with major revisions is a conditional acceptance. In an extreme situation where the author repeatedly does not incorporate requested revisions, a manuscript can be rejected. If the editors are not satisfied with the revision, then a manuscript can be given the accept with major revisions decision repeatedly until the substance of the manuscript is brought to the desired level. One key to a successful revision after an accept with major revision decision is careful execution of the specific revisions requested by the editors (which may include suggested revisions provided by the referee).Īnother key is communication: the author should provide the editor with a clear road map of the revisions executed, which includes copies of the requests and a description of how each request was fulfilled. Key substantive components of the revision We now turn to the elements of a revision at the accept with major revisions stage and also describe the overall process by which a manuscript moves to final publication. The EES mechanics for the including the editor letter and the referee letter in an EES submission are discussed under our general resubmission instructions and will not be repeated here. The manuscript will likely not go back to the referee for additional comment but, as the associate editor may choose to share the revision with the referee, the author should provide a secondary document that contains a “response to referee comments”. It is therefore critical for the authors to communicate exactly what they have done on the revision in a cover letter to the editor.
This category - which is called revise and resubmit at some other journals - means that a paper contains results which are clearly of a quality necessary for publication in JME, but that there remains substantial work to be done before the paper can be published in JME.Ī manuscript can receive the accept with major revisions decisions multiple times if the associate editor and supervisory editor feel that the list of necessary revisions has not been fully executed. The author of a manuscript which has received an accept with major revisions decision is to be congratulated, as the editors have concluded that the paper contains a publishable contribution when a list of specified revisions is successfully executed.
0 kommentar(er)
